Complete guidelines for conference organizers, scientific committees, and authors on manuscript preparation, double-blind peer review protocols, anti-plagiarism standards, AI usage declaration, and publication fee transparency.
Rigorous Double-Blind Model with Minimum 2 Independent Reviewers
Publisher upholds rigorous quality assurance for all conference proceedings. Conference organizers and scientific committees must conduct an authentic, rigorous peer review process:
Editor checks scope, template adherence & plagiarism (<20%).
Authors address reviewer comments within camera-ready deadline.
Scientific Committee signs off; proceedings volume prepared for DOI release.
Duties of Authors, Reviewers, and Editors
All parties involved in the conference publication lifecycle (authors, conference organizers, peer reviewers, and publisher) must adhere to the COPE Core Practices and ethical standards:
Similarity Thresholds & Transparent AI Usage Declarations
ACTANOVA enforces a strict zero-tolerance approach toward academic plagiarism and uncredited text appropriation:
Open Access Sustainability Model
To maintain open-access publishing, persistent Crossref DOI registration, JATS XML typesetting, and perpetual digital archiving, an Article Processing Charge (APC) applies to accepted papers:
Applicable for domestic Indonesian authors and conference participants.
Applicable for international corresponding authors and global participants.
There's no waiver now