Legal Pluralism and the Recognition of Customary Law in Indonesia

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="actanova-preservation">Journal Customary Law</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal Customary Law</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">3026-460X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indonesian Journal Publisher</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">legal-pluralism-and-the-recognition-of-customary-law-in-indonesia</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47134/jcl.v4i1.6383</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Legal Pluralism and the Recognition of Customary Law in Indonesia</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Pattinasarany</surname>
            <given-names>Eva Berta</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>22</day>
        <month>10</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 Indonesian Journal Publisher</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p> Indonesia is a legally plural society in which customary law coexists with state law. Articles 18B paragraph (2) and 28I paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution recognize customary communities and their traditional rights, yet sectoral recognition procedures can make the practical enforceability of those rights dependent on state validation. This article examines the resulting “recognition paradox” and develops a substantive legal pluralism model for customary-law recognition in Indonesia. The study uses normative legal research through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, with Constitutional Court Decision Number 35/PUU-X/2012 as the principal case and additional consideration of Decisions Number 31/PUU-V/2007 and 95/PUU-XII/2014. The analysis distinguishes constitutive recognition from declaratory-protective recognition, specifies minimum procedural and evidentiary safeguards, and develops a six-stage framework of identification, participation, verification, protection, coordination, and remedy. The findings show that recognition can protect customary rights while simultaneously producing institutional dependence when verification is treated as the source of legal existence. The article proposes that verification should provide legal certainty without creating the underlying customary community, while constitutional rights, third-party interests, and effective review remain protected. The proposed framework is normative and is presented as a basis for future empirical testing</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
        <kwd>Legal Pluralism</kwd>
        <kwd>Society</kwd>
        <kwd>Customary</kwd>
        <kwd>Community</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <self-uri content-type="application/pdf" xlink:title="ActaNova Permanent Archival PDF" xlink:href="https://actanova.mediadigitalpublikasi.com/journals/articles/legal-pluralism-and-the-recognition-of-customary-law-in-indonesia/pdf-stream" />
      <self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:title="ActaNova Responsive HTML Galley" xlink:href="https://actanova.mediadigitalpublikasi.com/journals/articles/legal-pluralism-and-the-recognition-of-customary-law-in-indonesia/html" />
      <self-uri content-type="original-pdf" xlink:title="Original Publisher PDF Document" xlink:href="https://journal.pubmedia.id/index.php/jcl/article/download/6383/6383" />
      <supplementary-material content-type="original-pdf" xlink:title="Original Publisher PDF Document" xlink:href="https://journal.pubmedia.id/index.php/jcl/article/download/6383/6383">
        <caption xml:lang="en"><p>Original PDF file published by Indonesian Journal Publisher</p></caption>
      </supplementary-material>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>Full Text &amp; Preserved Archival Statement</title>
      <p> Indonesia is a legally plural society in which customary law coexists with state law. Articles 18B paragraph (2) and 28I paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution recognize customary communities and their traditional rights, yet sectoral recognition procedures can make the practical enforceability of those rights dependent on state validation. This article examines the resulting “recognition paradox” and develops a substantive legal pluralism model for customary-law recognition in Indonesia. The study uses normative legal research through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, with Constitutional Court Decision Number 35/PUU-X/2012 as the principal case and additional consideration of Decisions Number 31/PUU-V/2007 and 95/PUU-XII/2014. The analysis distinguishes constitutive recognition from declaratory-protective recognition, specifies minimum procedural and evidentiary safeguards, and develops a six-stage framework of identification, participation, verification, protection, coordination, and remedy. The findings show that recognition can protect customary rights while simultaneously producing institutional dependence when verification is treated as the source of legal existence. The article proposes that verification should provide legal certainty without creating the underlying customary community, while constitutional rights, third-party interests, and effective review remain protected. The proposed framework is normative and is presented as a basis for future empirical testing</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <p>Digitally preserved and archived by ActaNova Digital Archival &amp; Preservation Network (Permanent Archival Node: https://actanova.mediadigitalpublikasi.com/journals).</p>
    </ack>
  </back>
</article>